AuditBoard vs Workiva: Which Should You Choose?

AuditBoard and Workiva both serve audit and compliance teams at large organizations, but they approach the market from different angles. AuditBoard is built around internal audit and operational risk. Workiva is built around connected reporting — financial filings, SEC reports, and ESG disclosures.

Feature Comparison

Internal audit is AuditBoard's core strength. The platform was built by former Big Four auditors and offers superior audit planning, fieldwork management, issue tracking, and reporting. Workiva supports audit workflows but was not designed around them.

Financial reporting is where Workiva excels. The platform's connected reporting model links financial data, narratives, and disclosures in a single environment. It is the standard for SEC filings and XBRL tagging.

SOX compliance is well-served by both, but AuditBoard edges ahead with more streamlined control testing workflows and evidence management designed specifically for SOX programs.

Who Should Choose AuditBoard

Choose AuditBoard if your primary need is internal audit management, SOX compliance testing, or operational risk management. AuditBoard's audit-centric design delivers a better experience for audit teams than any reporting-focused platform.

Who Should Choose Workiva

Choose Workiva if your primary need is SEC financial reporting, ESG disclosure, or any scenario requiring connected, collaborative document management. Workiva's reporting capabilities are unmatched.

Our Recommendation

These platforms complement more than they compete. Many large organizations use both — AuditBoard for internal audit and SOX, Workiva for financial and ESG reporting. If you must choose one, let your primary use case guide the decision. Audit-first organizations should choose AuditBoard. Reporting-first organizations should choose Workiva.